Ch. 5's Big Question: Why do you think slavery was so much more prominent in Greco-Roman civilization than in India or China?

I think slavery was more prominent in Greco-Roman civilization than in India or China. This is an obvious reason that Greco-Roman civilization contains slavery while he/she was unquestioned about features throughout all over civilizations "until the nineteenth century, and in a few places, it still exists" (Strayer, 218). This is why slavery in China and India is not important because Chinese prominence is changing dynasties in the twentieth century; Indians preferred to think and behave about what kind of population is throughout all over the South Asian peninsula. So, it was prominent that the Greco-Roman population had more population of slavery.

The change and persistence alike "have long provided the inextricable warp and woof of both individual experience and historical study" (Strayer, 218). There has no doubt that lives are important throughout Greco-Roman civilization for slaveries to live than China or India. Therefore, "Untangling their elusive relationship has figured prominently in the task of historians and has contributed much to the enduring fascination of historical study" (Strayer, 218).